Reiner Goebel wrote:
I mean, how many 1" branches could you possibly have on one tree to make for an hour's worth of nothing but pruning without taking time out to think?.
What about pruning 500 trees?
OK, the woman doesn't have to, bu I do. So, I guess this issue is not relevant unless one is planning to have a whole nursery.
But one still needs a strong hand, no doubt. And this will disqualify a certain percentage of women.
Reiner Goebel wrote:
But bonsai is _not_ about size! So women create trees that they can carry and repot without the help of their beefy husbands. Being limited in the size of their bonsai does not mean that they are limited in the art of it.
Sure, they can do small bonsai, but excluding them from the whole range of sizes that men do is another limiting factor.
Have you ever been to a California juniper dig in the desert? Carrying that thing on your back for an hour to your car is no small matter for a little woman.
Sure, a woman doesn't have to do that either, she can just buy the tree in the bonsai store. Or can she? Well, she can buy some tree that
men collected. And she will have to pay a lot of money for it.
All these little things add up to the advantage of men.
Reiner Goebel wrote:
In my view it is that they have other priorities, mainly to do with family matters. Few women have the necessary leisure. Many men do thanks to their wives.
Cooking, cleaning and other housework is not relevant if you look at why painting for instance has a higher percentage of women artist than bonsai. Housework equally apply to painters as well, and yet they have more women.
We have to look at circumstances unique to bonsai versus the other arts. Family matters are not unique to bonsai.