It is currently Wed Sep 17, 2014 9:38 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 97 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 12:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 12:09 pm
Posts: 11
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Hi Will,

What about Casuarina. Will it be catagorized as conifer or broad leaf?

Budi


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 12:46 pm 
Offline
Editor

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 12:20 pm
Posts: 494
Location: south of Munich, Germany
Budi,
this is not our decision. This is decided by botanists. I am personally not quite sure whether it is an agiospermum or gymnopsermum. But a botanist would know and then it is clear. This was the basic idea, to have a scientifical classification which ends all this bonsai confusion. I think it is a conifer.
Walter


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 1:40 pm 
Offline
Editor

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 12:20 pm
Posts: 494
Location: south of Munich, Germany
My research has shown that the casuarina is in the beech section of the angiopserms. Thus it is NOT a conifer (gymnoperm) it is a broadleave tree (angiosperm)

To avoid the terms angiopsperms and gymnoperms which would be too much for non-botanists we have called angiospers broadleave trees and gymnopsperms conifers. There are no exact English terms unfortunately. The common distinction between conifers and deciduous is botanically nonsense and causes all sorts of confusion.Outside the English speaking world this distinction DOES NOT EXIST. This again causes endless misunderstandings on an international forum and in an international contest.

Casuarina is a broadleve tree (angiosperm). Regardless of whether it certainly does not have broad leaves!

Some will question why we bothered to use this nomenclature and not the common one that it used in bonsai. Truth is that there is not a common one if you look at the whole world and not just the English speaking one. The only common one is offered by science: angioperms and gymnopserms. Since this is an international forum and an international contest this had to be done to avoid total confusion.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 3:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 2:35 am
Posts: 3
Location: Houthalen, Belgium
Maybe it would be a good idea to add a "Suiseki" category to this contest. I think this could be very interesting for all the people who like suiseki. I am sure there will come great looking entries from all over the world, and that it would be an valuable addition to this contest...

Kind regards,
Hans


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 6:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 8:04 pm
Posts: 244
Location: South San Francisco, CA
If it is decided to have a stone category, may I suggest that it be called "viewing stone", as this covers the field. "Suiseki" is too specific.

Mike


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 7:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 2:11 am
Posts: 6469
Location: Michigan USA
How do the other members feel about this?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 11:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 11:37 am
Posts: 61
Location: Indonesia
I am not totally agree. Even include the companion plant is already bit out from bonsai.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 11:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2007 11:37 am
Posts: 61
Location: Indonesia
From the plant physiology, at least Casuarina is not conifer. As Walter said, broad leaf tree not neccessary always have broad leaf, as deciduous not always drop the leaves...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 25, 2008 11:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 2:11 am
Posts: 6469
Location: Michigan USA
My thoughts are that Suiseki is quite different from bonsai and as such, would require judges that have specialized knowledge in this area. Although the judges for this contest are highly skilled in the art of bonsai and display and have experience judging bonsai and display, we would need a different criteria for choosing judges for viewing stones.

It would be unwise to lump this wonderful art into this contest to be judged by people who may not be prepared to do so, this idea deserves better.

We would however like to invite Suiseki collectors to send in photographs of, as well as information on, the viewing stones in their collections for consideration as featured galleries here at AoB. If we create enough interest, the next contest might include such a gallery and select judges with this in mind.


Thanks for the thoughts!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 12:26 am 
Offline
Editor

Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2005 12:20 pm
Posts: 494
Location: south of Munich, Germany
I am not so fond of the suiseki idea. It is a field entirely by itself. It has nothing to do with bonsai other than a smal minority of bosaiists are also practicing this. Next thing is ikebana. And then we might as well include all dos.
To be not so fond is an understatement. I am radically agains this dilusion.

Walter


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 7:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 12:09 pm
Posts: 11
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Thanks Walter for your research on Casuarina.

We need some clarification as well on Podocarpus and Taxus. Can somebody help?

I think it is not a bad idea to have suiseki in a feature galery of the AoB.

Budi


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 8:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 2:11 am
Posts: 6469
Location: Michigan USA
Budi Sulistyo wrote:
Thanks Walter for your research on Casuarina.

We need some clarification as well on Podocarpus and Taxus. Can somebody help?

I think it is not a bad idea to have suiseki in a feature galery of the AoB.

Budi



Podocarpus is listed as a gymnoperm so it is a conifer ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Podocarpus ) ( http://www.conifers.org/po/po/index.htm )


As to Taxus:

"The Taxaceae is now generally included with all other conifers in the order Pinales, as DNA analysis has shown that the yews are monophyletic with the other families in the Pinales" - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxaceae


So these examples would be conifers.



Will


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 1:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 08, 2006 12:45 pm
Posts: 99
Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh
Interesting clarification on 'Conifer' by Walter and Will, thanks.

However, on visual considerations I am quite pleasantly surprised to note that Podocarpus is a gymnosperm and hence a conifer (although the leaves look broad-leaved) and not Casuarina which resembles so much with the conifers!

Regarding Suiseki, it is a category altogether different and will not fit here.

Shaukat


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 11:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 12:09 pm
Posts: 11
Location: Jakarta, Indonesia
Thanks for the clarifications.
I raised all of the questions just to make everybody aware of the criteria, so that there will be no misunderstanding in the contest.
Budi


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 12:06 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 2:11 am
Posts: 6469
Location: Michigan USA
We certainly do appreciate your input Budi, thank you.


Will


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Forum locked This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 97 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Copyright 2006-2008 The Art of Bonsai Project.
All rights reserved.
Original MSSimplicity Theme created by Matt Sims © 2004
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group